How Many Elements On The Periodic Table

Has element 119 been made?

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ununennium, 119 Uue

Ununennium
Pronunciation ( listen ) ​ ( OON -oon- EN -ee-əm )
Alternative names element 119, eka-francium
Ununennium in the periodic table
Hydrogen Helium
Lithium Beryllium Boron Carbon Nitrogen Oxygen Fluorine Neon
Sodium Magnesium Aluminium Silicon Phosphorus Sulfur Chlorine Argon
Potassium Calcium Scandium Titanium Vanadium Chromium Manganese Iron Cobalt Nickel Copper Zinc Gallium Germanium Arsenic Selenium Bromine Krypton
Rubidium Strontium Yttrium Zirconium Niobium Molybdenum Technetium Ruthenium Rhodium Palladium Silver Cadmium Indium Tin Antimony Tellurium Iodine Xenon
Caesium Barium Lanthanum Cerium Praseodymium Neodymium Promethium Samarium Europium Gadolinium Terbium Dysprosium Holmium Erbium Thulium Ytterbium Lutetium Hafnium Tantalum Tungsten Rhenium Osmium Iridium Platinum Gold Mercury (element) Thallium Lead Bismuth Polonium Astatine Radon
Francium Radium Actinium Thorium Protactinium Uranium Neptunium Plutonium Americium Curium Berkelium Californium Einsteinium Fermium Mendelevium Nobelium Lawrencium Rutherfordium Dubnium Seaborgium Bohrium Hassium Meitnerium Darmstadtium Roentgenium Copernicium Nihonium Flerovium Moscovium Livermorium Tennessine Oganesson

table>

Ununennium Unbinilium Unquadtrium Unquadquadium Unquadpentium Unquadhexium Unquadseptium Unquadoctium Unquadennium Unpentnilium Unpentunium Unpentbium Unpenttrium Unpentquadium Unpentpentium Unpenthexium Unpentseptium Unpentoctium Unpentennium Unhexnilium Unhexunium Unhexbium Unhextrium Unhexquadium Unhexpentium Unhexhexium Unhexseptium Unhexoctium Unhexennium Unseptnilium Unseptunium Unseptbium
Unsepttrium Unseptquadum Biniltrium Binilunium Binilbium Biniltrium Binilunium Binilbium Biniltrium Binilunium Binilbium Biniltrium Binilunium Binilbium Biniltrium Biunnilium Unpentseptium Unpentoctium Unpentennium Unhexnilium Unhexunium Unhexbium Unhextrium Unhexquadium Unhexpentium Unhexhexium Bibiunium Bibibium Bibiquadium
Unbiunium Unbibium Unbitrium Unbiquadium Unbipentium Unbihexium Unbiseptium Unbioctium Unbiennium Untrinilium Untriunium Untribium Untritrium Untriquadium Untripentium Untrihexium Untriseptium Untrioctium Untriennium Unquadnilium Unquadunium Unquadbium
Untrioctium Untriennium Unquadnilium Unquadunium Unquadbium Untrioctium Untriennium Unquadnilium Unquadunium Unquadbium Untrioctium Untriennium Unquadnilium Unquadunium Unquadbium Untrioctium Untriennium Unquadnilium Unquadunium Unquadbium Unquadunium Unquadbium

/td>

Fr ↑ Uue ↓ (Ust) oganesson ← ununennium → unbinilium

/td> Atomic number ( Z ) 119 Group group 1: hydrogen and alkali metals Period period 8 Block s-block Electron configuration 8s 1 (predicted) Electrons per shell 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8, 1 (predicted) Physical properties Phase at STP unknown (could be solid or liquid) Melting point 273–303 K ​(0–30 °C, ​32–86 °F) (predicted) Boiling point 903 K ​(630 °C, ​1166 °F) (predicted) Density (near r.t.) 3 g/cm 3 (predicted) Heat of fusion 2.01–2.05 kJ/mol (extrapolated) Atomic properties Oxidation states ( +1 ), (+3) (predicted) Electronegativity Pauling scale: 0.86 (predicted) Ionization energies

  • 1st: 463.1 kJ/mol
  • 2nd: 1698.1 kJ/mol
  • (predicted)
Atomic radius empirical: 240 pm (predicted) Covalent radius 263–281 pm (extrapolated) Other properties Crystal structure ​ body-centered cubic (bcc) (extrapolated) CAS Number 54846-86-5 History Naming IUPAC systematic element name
  • view
  • talk
  • edit

| references

Ununennium, or element 119, is a predicted chemical element, Its symbol is Uue, Ununennium and Uue are substitute names made by the IUPAC, (meaning “one-one-nine-ium” in Latin) until permanent names are made. Ununennium is the element with the largest atomic number that has not been created yet.

Are there 120 elements in the periodic table?

The Mendeleev table is currently composed of 118 chemical elements. Benoît Gall travelled to Russia and Japan in search of elements 119 and 120, that have never yet been observed.

Has element 121 been discovered?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unbiunium, 121 Ubu

Theoretical element
Unbiunium
Pronunciation ​ ( OON -by- OON -ee-əm )
Alternative names eka-actinium, superactinium
Unbiunium in the periodic table
Hydrogen Helium
Lithium Beryllium Boron Carbon Nitrogen Oxygen Fluorine Neon
Sodium Magnesium Aluminium Silicon Phosphorus Sulfur Chlorine Argon
Potassium Calcium Scandium Titanium Vanadium Chromium Manganese Iron Cobalt Nickel Copper Zinc Gallium Germanium Arsenic Selenium Bromine Krypton
Rubidium Strontium Yttrium Zirconium Niobium Molybdenum Technetium Ruthenium Rhodium Palladium Silver Cadmium Indium Tin Antimony Tellurium Iodine Xenon
Caesium Barium Lanthanum Cerium Praseodymium Neodymium Promethium Samarium Europium Gadolinium Terbium Dysprosium Holmium Erbium Thulium Ytterbium Lutetium Hafnium Tantalum Tungsten Rhenium Osmium Iridium Platinum Gold Mercury (element) Thallium Lead Bismuth Polonium Astatine Radon
Francium Radium Actinium Thorium Protactinium Uranium Neptunium Plutonium Americium Curium Berkelium Californium Einsteinium Fermium Mendelevium Nobelium Lawrencium Rutherfordium Dubnium Seaborgium Bohrium Hassium Meitnerium Darmstadtium Roentgenium Copernicium Nihonium Flerovium Moscovium Livermorium Tennessine Oganesson

table>

Ununennium Unbinilium Unquadtrium Unquadquadium Unquadpentium Unquadhexium Unquadseptium Unquadoctium Unquadennium Unpentnilium Unpentunium Unpentbium Unpenttrium Unpentquadium Unpentpentium Unpenthexium Unpentseptium Unpentoctium Unpentennium Unhexnilium Unhexunium Unhexbium Unhextrium Unhexquadium Unhexpentium Unhexhexium Unhexseptium Unhexoctium Unhexennium Unseptnilium Unseptunium Unseptbium
Unbiunium Unbibium Unbitrium Unbiquadium Unbipentium Unbihexium Unbiseptium Unbioctium Unbiennium Untrinilium Untriunium Untribium Untritrium Untriquadium Untripentium Untrihexium Untriseptium Untrioctium Untriennium Unquadnilium Unquadunium Unquadbium

/td>

— ↑ Ubu ↓ — unbinilium ← unbiunium → unbibium

/td> Atomic number ( Z ) 121 Group g-block groups (no number) Period period 8 (theoretical, extended table) Block g-block Electron configuration 8s 2 8p 1 (predicted) Electrons per shell 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8, 3 (predicted) Physical properties Phase at STP unknown Atomic properties Oxidation states (+1), ( +3 ) (predicted) Ionization energies

1st: 429.4 (predicted) kJ/mol

Other properties CAS Number 54500-70-8 History Naming IUPAC systematic element name
  • view
  • talk
  • edit

| references

Unbiunium, also known as eka-actinium or element 121, is the hypothetical chemical element with symbol Ubu and atomic number 121. Unbiunium and Ubu are the temporary systematic IUPAC name and symbol respectively, which are used until the element is discovered, confirmed, and a permanent name is decided upon.

In the periodic table of the elements, it is expected to be the first of the superactinides, and the third element in the eighth period, It has attracted attention because of some predictions that it may be in the island of stability, It is also likely to be the first of a new g-block of elements. Unbiunium has not yet been synthesized.

It is expected to be one of the last few reachable elements with current technology; the limit could be anywhere between element 120 and 124, It will also likely be far more difficult to synthesize than the elements known so far up to 118, and still more difficult than elements 119 and 120,

The teams at RIKEN in Japan and at the JINR in Dubna, Russia have indicated plans to attempt the synthesis of element 121 in the future after they attempt elements 119 and 120. The position of unbiunium in the periodic table suggests that it would have similar properties to lanthanum and actinium ; however, relativistic effects may cause some of its properties to differ from those expected from a straight application of periodic trends,

For example, unbiunium is expected to have a s 2 p valence electron configuration, instead of the s 2 d of lanthanum and actinium or the s 2 g expected from the Madelung rule, but this is not predicted to affect its chemistry much. It would on the other hand significantly lower its first ionization energy beyond what would be expected from periodic trends.

Is element 138 possible?

138 Uts ← untrioctium → Ute
↑ Uto ↓ Uoo periodic table – Extended Periodic Table

/td> General Name, Symbol, Number untrioctium, Uto, 138 Chemical series Superactinides Group, Period, Block g18, 8, g Appearance unknown Standard atomic weight u (supposition)  g·mol −1 Electron configuration 5g 18 8s 2 Electrons per shell 2, 8, 18, 32, 50, 18, 8, 2 Physical properties Phase presumably solid Miscellaneous Selected isotopes

Main article: Isotopes of untrioctium

iso NA half-life DM DE (MeV) DP

/td> References

Untrioctium ( pronounced /ˌʌntraɪˈɒktiəm/ ) is an unsynthesized chemical element with atomic number 138 and symbol Uto.

Is there 122 elements?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unbibium, 122 Ubb

Theoretical element
Unbibium
Pronunciation ​ ( OON -by- BY -əm )
Alternative names element 122, eka-thorium
Unbibium in the periodic table
Hydrogen Helium
Lithium Beryllium Boron Carbon Nitrogen Oxygen Fluorine Neon
Sodium Magnesium Aluminium Silicon Phosphorus Sulfur Chlorine Argon
Potassium Calcium Scandium Titanium Vanadium Chromium Manganese Iron Cobalt Nickel Copper Zinc Gallium Germanium Arsenic Selenium Bromine Krypton
Rubidium Strontium Yttrium Zirconium Niobium Molybdenum Technetium Ruthenium Rhodium Palladium Silver Cadmium Indium Tin Antimony Tellurium Iodine Xenon
Caesium Barium Lanthanum Cerium Praseodymium Neodymium Promethium Samarium Europium Gadolinium Terbium Dysprosium Holmium Erbium Thulium Ytterbium Lutetium Hafnium Tantalum Tungsten Rhenium Osmium Iridium Platinum Gold Mercury (element) Thallium Lead Bismuth Polonium Astatine Radon
Francium Radium Actinium Thorium Protactinium Uranium Neptunium Plutonium Americium Curium Berkelium Californium Einsteinium Fermium Mendelevium Nobelium Lawrencium Rutherfordium Dubnium Seaborgium Bohrium Hassium Meitnerium Darmstadtium Roentgenium Copernicium Nihonium Flerovium Moscovium Livermorium Tennessine Oganesson

table>

Ununennium Unbinilium Unquadtrium Unquadquadium Unquadpentium Unquadhexium Unquadseptium Unquadoctium Unquadennium Unpentnilium Unpentunium Unpentbium Unpenttrium Unpentquadium Unpentpentium Unpenthexium Unpentseptium Unpentoctium Unpentennium Unhexnilium Unhexunium Unhexbium Unhextrium Unhexquadium Unhexpentium Unhexhexium Unhexseptium Unhexoctium Unhexennium Unseptnilium Unseptunium Unseptbium
Unbiunium Unbibium Unbitrium Unbiquadium Unbipentium Unbihexium Unbiseptium Unbioctium Unbiennium Untrinilium Untriunium Untribium Untritrium Untriquadium Untripentium Untrihexium Untriseptium Untrioctium Untriennium Unquadnilium Unquadunium Unquadbium

/td>

— ↑ Ubb ↓ — unbiunium ← unbibium → unbitrium

/td> Atomic number ( Z ) 122 Group g-block groups (no number) Period period 8 (theoretical, extended table) Block g-block Electron configuration predictions vary, see text Physical properties Phase at STP unknown Atomic properties Oxidation states ( +4 ) (predicted) Ionization energies

  • 1st: 545 (predicted) kJ/mol
  • 2nd: 1090 (predicted) kJ/mol
  • 3rd: 1848 (predicted) kJ/mol
Other properties CAS Number 54576-73-7 History Naming IUPAC systematic element name
  • view
  • talk
  • edit

| references

Unbibium, also known as element 122 or eka-thorium, is the hypothetical chemical element in the periodic table with the placeholder symbol of Ubb and atomic number 122. Unbibium and Ubb are the temporary systematic IUPAC name and symbol respectively, which are used until the element is discovered, confirmed, and a permanent name is decided upon.

In the periodic table of the elements, it is expected to follow unbiunium as the second element of the superactinides and the fourth element of the 8th period, Similarly to unbiunium, it is expected to fall within the range of the island of stability, potentially conferring additional stability on some isotopes, especially 306 Ubb which is expected to have a magic number of neutrons (184).

Despite several attempts, unbibium has not yet been synthesized, nor have any naturally occurring isotopes been found to exist. There are currently no plans to attempt to synthesize unbibium. In 2008, it was claimed to have been discovered in natural thorium samples, but that claim has now been dismissed by recent repetitions of the experiment using more accurate techniques.

Is Element 173 possible?

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unsepttrium, 173 Ust

Unsepttrium
Unsepttrium in the periodic table
Hydrogen Helium
Lithium Beryllium Boron Carbon Nitrogen Oxygen Fluorine Neon
Sodium Magnesium Aluminium Silicon Phosphorus Sulfur Chlorine Argon
Potassium Calcium Scandium Titanium Vanadium Chromium Manganese Iron Cobalt Nickel Copper Zinc Gallium Germanium Arsenic Selenium Bromine Krypton
Rubidium Strontium Yttrium Zirconium Niobium Molybdenum Technetium Ruthenium Rhodium Palladium Silver Cadmium Indium Tin Antimony Tellurium Iodine Xenon
Caesium Barium Lanthanum Cerium Praseodymium Neodymium Promethium Samarium Europium Gadolinium Terbium Dysprosium Holmium Erbium Thulium Ytterbium Lutetium Hafnium Tantalum Tungsten Rhenium Osmium Iridium Platinum Gold Mercury (element) Thallium Lead Bismuth Polonium Astatine Radon
Francium Radium Actinium Thorium Protactinium Uranium Neptunium Plutonium Americium Curium Berkelium Californium Einsteinium Fermium Mendelevium Nobelium Lawrencium Rutherfordium Dubnium Seaborgium Bohrium Hassium Meitnerium Darmstadtium Roentgenium Copernicium Nihonium Flerovium Moscovium Livermorium Tennessine Oganesson

table>

Ununennium Unbinilium Unquadtrium Unquadquadium Unquadpentium Unquadhexium Unquadseptium Unquadoctium Unquadennium Unpentnilium Unpentunium Unpentbium Unpenttrium Unpentquadium Unpentpentium Unpenthexium Unpentseptium Unpentoctium Unpentennium Unhexnilium Unhexunium Unhexbium Unhextrium Unhexquadium Unhexpentium Unhexhexium Unhexseptium Unhexoctium Unhexennium Unseptnilium Unseptunium Unseptbium
Unsepttrium Unseptquadum Biniltrium Binilunium Binilbium Biniltrium Binilunium Binilbium Biniltrium Binilunium Binilbium Biniltrium Binilunium Binilbium Biniltrium Biunnilium Unpentseptium Unpentoctium Unpentennium Unhexnilium Unhexunium Unhexbium Unhextrium Unhexquadium Unhexpentium Unhexhexium Bibiunium Bibibium Bibiquadium
Unbiunium Unbibium Unbitrium Unbiquadium Unbipentium Unbihexium Unbiseptium Unbioctium Unbiennium Untrinilium Untriunium Untribium Untritrium Untriquadium Untripentium Untrihexium Untriseptium Untrioctium Untriennium Unquadnilium Unquadunium Unquadbium
Untrioctium Untriennium Unquadnilium Unquadunium Unquadbium Untrioctium Untriennium Unquadnilium Unquadunium Unquadbium Untrioctium Untriennium Unquadnilium Unquadunium Unquadbium Untrioctium Untriennium Unquadnilium Unquadunium Unquadbium Unquadunium Unquadbium

/td>

Uue ↑ Ust ↓ (Bbs) unseptbium ← unsepttrium → unseptquadium

/td> Atomic number ( Z ) 173 Group unknown Period period in the periodic table Electrons per shell 2, 8, 18, 32, 50, 33, 18, 8, 4 (predicted) Physical properties Atomic properties Oxidation states Template:Infobox element/symbol-to-oxidation-state : Symbol “Ust” not known Other properties Main isotopes of unsepttrium

Iso­tope Abun­dance Half-life ( t 1/2 ) Decay mode Pro­duct
512 Ust syn

/td>

view talk edit

| references

Unsepttrium (), also known as dvi – francium or element 173, is a possible chemical element which has not been observed to occur naturally, nor has it yet been made. Due to instabilities, it is not known if this element is possible, as the instabilities may hint that the periodic table ends soon after the island of stability at unbihexium ; however, if possible, it is likely the heaviest possible neutral element.

Is there an element 140?

Cerium-140 | Ce | CID 25087154 – PubChem.

Is there a 124 element?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unbiquadium, 124 Ubq

Theoretical element
Unbiquadium
Pronunciation ​ ( OON -by- KWOD -ee-əm )
Alternative names element 124, eka-uranium
Unbiquadium in the periodic table
Hydrogen Helium
Lithium Beryllium Boron Carbon Nitrogen Oxygen Fluorine Neon
Sodium Magnesium Aluminium Silicon Phosphorus Sulfur Chlorine Argon
Potassium Calcium Scandium Titanium Vanadium Chromium Manganese Iron Cobalt Nickel Copper Zinc Gallium Germanium Arsenic Selenium Bromine Krypton
Rubidium Strontium Yttrium Zirconium Niobium Molybdenum Technetium Ruthenium Rhodium Palladium Silver Cadmium Indium Tin Antimony Tellurium Iodine Xenon
Caesium Barium Lanthanum Cerium Praseodymium Neodymium Promethium Samarium Europium Gadolinium Terbium Dysprosium Holmium Erbium Thulium Ytterbium Lutetium Hafnium Tantalum Tungsten Rhenium Osmium Iridium Platinum Gold Mercury (element) Thallium Lead Bismuth Polonium Astatine Radon
Francium Radium Actinium Thorium Protactinium Uranium Neptunium Plutonium Americium Curium Berkelium Californium Einsteinium Fermium Mendelevium Nobelium Lawrencium Rutherfordium Dubnium Seaborgium Bohrium Hassium Meitnerium Darmstadtium Roentgenium Copernicium Nihonium Flerovium Moscovium Livermorium Tennessine Oganesson

table>

Ununennium Unbinilium Unquadtrium Unquadquadium Unquadpentium Unquadhexium Unquadseptium Unquadoctium Unquadennium Unpentnilium Unpentunium Unpentbium Unpenttrium Unpentquadium Unpentpentium Unpenthexium Unpentseptium Unpentoctium Unpentennium Unhexnilium Unhexunium Unhexbium Unhextrium Unhexquadium Unhexpentium Unhexhexium Unhexseptium Unhexoctium Unhexennium Unseptnilium Unseptunium Unseptbium
Unbiunium Unbibium Unbitrium Unbiquadium Unbipentium Unbihexium Unbiseptium Unbioctium Unbiennium Untrinilium Untriunium Untribium Untritrium Untriquadium Untripentium Untrihexium Untriseptium Untrioctium Untriennium Unquadnilium Unquadunium Unquadbium

/td>

— ↑ Ubq ↓ — unbitrium ← unbiquadium → unbipentium

/td> Atomic number ( Z ) 124 Group g-block groups (no number) Period period 8 (theoretical, extended table) Block g-block Electron configuration predictions vary, see text Physical properties Phase at STP unknown Atomic properties Oxidation states ( +6 ) (predicted) Other properties CAS Number 54500-72-0 History Naming IUPAC systematic element name

  • view
  • talk
  • edit

| references

Unbiquadium, also known as element 124 or eka-uranium, is the hypothetical chemical element with atomic number 124 and placeholder symbol Ubq. Unbiquadium and Ubq are the temporary IUPAC name and symbol, respectively, until the element is discovered, confirmed, and a permanent name is decided upon.

In the periodic table, unbiquadium is expected to be a g-block superactinide and the sixth element in the 8th period, Unbiquadium has attracted attention, as it may lie within the island of stability, leading to longer half-lives, especially for 308 Ubq which is predicted to have a magic number of neutrons (184).

Despite several searches, unbiquadium has not been synthesized, nor have any naturally occurring isotopes been found to exist. It is believed that the synthesis of unbiquadium will be far more challenging than that of lighter undiscovered elements, and nuclear instability may pose further difficulties in identifying unbiquadium, unless the island of stability has a stronger stabilizing effect than predicted in this region.

What is the 128th element?

The element which comes on 128 number is Trititanium (Tt).

Is there 133 elements?

Untritrium
133 Utt
– ↑ Utt ↓ Uot

table>

Extended periodic table untribium ← untritrium → untriquadium

/td>

Appearance unknown General properties Name, symbol, number untritrium, Utt, 133 Pronunciation / uː n t r aɪ ˈ t r i ə m / Element category superactinides Group, period, block N/A, 8, g Mass number not applicable Electron configuration 5g 8 6f 3 8s 2 8p 2 (predicted) 2, 8, 18, 32, 40, 21, 8, 4 (predicted) How Many Elements On The Periodic Table Physical properties unknown Atomic properties unknown Most stable isotopes Main article: Isotopes of untritrium
iso NA half-life DM DE ( MeV ) DP
354 Utt (predicted) syn

/td> v • t • e • r

Untritrium, Utt, is the temporary name for element 133. Isotopes are predicted within the bands 443 Utt to 379 Utt, 370 Utt to 354 Utt, and 317 Utt to 314 Utt. There may be isotopes in the band from the neutron dripline to 444 Utt, but it is not possible to predict which ones are possible.

Reported half-lives are all less than 1 hr, and most are under 1 sec. Sixty isotopes within the bands 443 Utt to 384 Utt are predicted to form. All Utt isotopes which can form, predicted or guessed, will last less than 1000 sec after the event which led to their formation. NUCLEAR PROPERTIES INFORMATION SOURCES While studies addressing specific issues have been carried out to very high N (1),

and to moderate Z (2), (Z,N) or (Z,A) maps predicting half-lives and decay modes are almost completely limited to the region below Z = 130 and N = 220. There appears to be only one such map which extends beyond that region and is accessible (3), (Z,N) maps for half-life and decay mode in Ref.3 extend as high as Z = 175 and N = 333.

Half-lives are reported as bands 3 orders of magnitude wide (0.001 – 1 sec, for example), and should be considered accurate only to within +/- orders of magnitude (presumably from band center. (A nuclide reported to be in the 0.001 – 1 sec band should be considered to have a possible half-life between 10 -4.5 sec and 10 1.5 sec.) Decay modes are limited alpha emission, beta emission, proton emission, and fission; and to the principal one for each nuclide.

There are areas where two modes (or more) may be important, meaning that small uncertainties is model parameters could have produced different results. It is also possible that cluster decay may become important above the neutron shell closures at N = 228 and 308.

  • Ref.3 does have two significant weakness in the way data are presented.
  • Nuclides which are beta-stable are identified by black squares, overwriting decay mode and half-life information.
  • In addition, nuclides having half-lives less than 10 -09 sec are not reported, which obscures the distinction between nuclides having half-lives in the 10 -09 and 10 -14 sec band and nuclear drops whose half-life is under 10 -14 sec.

Above Z around 126, predictions in Ref.3 may not reach the neutron dripline. This can be an important limitation because the only processes which can form nuclei at more than atoms / star quantity generate very neutron-rich nuclei. It is possible to to make a crude, but conservative (high N) guess for the dripline’s location by averaging predicted values for even-N nuclei.

It is also possible to guess at regions of the (Z,N) or (Z,A) plane in which a fission barrier high enough to permit nuclides exists by using a first-order, liquid drop model. Specific numbers are reported for these guesses, not with the expectation that they are accurate, but because they are consistent from element to element.

They allow construction of a map which at least hints at where in the (Z,A) plane nuclides may be found. GUESSED PROPERTIES A simple liquid-drop picture indicates that 473 Utt to 444 Utt are unlikely to decay by neutron emission and are stable enough against fission to allow beta decay.

  1. Between 466 Utt and 444 Utt, Ref.3 makes no predictions, but extrapolation from higher Z indicates that it would predict some short-lived, fission-decaying nuclides.
  2. Nuclear properties above 443 Utt are highly uncertain, but it is likely that some relatively long-lived, beta-decaying isotopes of Utt are possible.

It is possible to state that half-lives longer than 1 sec are implausible between the neutron dripline (nominally 473 Utt) and 444 Utt. PREDICTED PROPERTIES Isotopes in the band 443 Utt – 435 Utt are predicted to decay by beta emission. Since predicted half-lives are in the 10 -06 – 0.001 sec range and beta decay partial half-lives far from stability have a minimum near 0.001 sec (4), that is about where half-lives should lie.

Isotopes in the band 434 Utt – 424 Utt are predicted to decay by a mixture of beta emission and fission, with fission dominant in most cases. It appears to be possible for structure to destabilize a nuclide (5), so the data reported appear to be realistic, Half-lives are masked by other features of the map, but half-lives of nuclides of higher Z and comparable N indicate half-lives in the band 0.001 – 1 sec.

Isotopes in the band 423 Utt – 402 Utt are predicted to decay beta emission. Half-lives are predicted to lie between 0.001 and 1 sec. Fission may occur as a secondary decay mode, particularly at the low-A end of this band.401 Utt and 400 Utt are predicted to have a dominant fission decay branch, with half-lives in the 0.001 – 1 sec range.

  • Beta emission is a likely secondary decay branch.
  • Most isotopes in the band 399 Utt – 391 Utt are predicted to decay with half-lives in the 0.001 – 1 sec range, and predominantly by beta emission.
  • Fission dominates for 397 Utt, 395 Utt, and 393 Utt, which also has a half-life under 0.001 sec.
  • Between 390 Utt and 386 Utt, most isotopes are predicted to decay by fission with half-lives in the 10 -09 – 10 -06 sec range.389 Utt, though (an even-N nuclide) is predicted to beta decay with half-life in the 0.001 – 1 sec range.385 Utt through 383 Utt are predicted to decay by beta emission with half-lives in the 0.001 – 1 sec range.

Nearby nuclides with comparable N counts and lower Z also show stabilization against fission. The reported data are confusing but not unrealistic. All isotopes in the 382 Utt to 379 Utt band are predicted to decay by fission. Odd-N isotopes are predicted to have half-lives in the 0.001 – 1 sec range while even-N isotopes have half-lives in the 10 -09 – 10 -06 sec range.

There is a gap from 378 Utt to 371 Utt in which properties are not reported. These may be short lived nuclides or nuclear drops whose half-life is less than 10 -14 sec. It appears to be the expected destabilized region above N = 228. Between 370 Utt and 361 Utt all isotopes are predicted to decay by fission.

Half-lives are predicted to increase as N declines, from the 10 -09 – 10 -06 sec range to the 0.001 – 1 sec range at 363 Utt through 361 Utt (for which N = 228) Below N = 228, stability of isotopes in the band 360 Utt to 354 Utt falls abruptly as A declines.

  • Fission dominates for all isotopes.
  • This is somewhat odd, given that neutron shell closures at N = 184 and 308 produce relatively stable, alpha-decaying nuclides below the “magic” number.
  • A gap exists between 353 Utt and 318 Utt which contains either nuclides whose half-life is under 10 -09 sec or nuclear drops too unstable to qualify as nuclides.

The 317 Utt – 314 Utt band contains isotopes predicted to decay by proton emission with half-lives in the 10 -09 – 10 -06 sec range. N = 258 CLOSURE The model used to predict decay properties of Utt isotopes has a relatively weak neutron shell closure at N = 258.

  • Some neutron-dripline studies have indicated a strong closure at N = 258.
  • If that closure is strong, some isotopes in the 392 Utt to 382 Utt band may decay by beta emission rather than fission as predicted.
  • They will probably be short-lived, but act as precursors to long-lived nuclides.
  • By contrast, one or more isotopes in the band 381 Utt to 367 Utt will probably be short-lived, but are daughters of long-lived, alpha-decaying species.

Interpolating between 472 Uhq and 293 Cn gives a reasonable value for maximum half-life of any nuclides stabilized by a strong N = 258 closure of 0.5 yr. Either alpha decay or beta decay may occur in this band, but fission can be expected to be suppressed.

  1. These are not predictions of decay properties for nuclides in the vicinity of N = 258.
  2. This entire exercise is qualitative guesswork.
  3. No numbers, but a tantalizing hint of what might be.
  4. OCCURRENCE FORMATION Where nuclear drops between the neutron dripline (nominally 473 Utt) and 444 Utt can be nuclides, they may form.

Heavier isotopes may form directly from disintegrating neutron star material, and the remainder may form via beta decay chains from lower-Z nuclides. Since some of these chains may be terminated by short-lived, fission-decaying nuclides, it is not possible to say which isotopes of Utt in this range can form.

  • Nearly all nuclear drops in the bands 443 Utt to 379 Utt, 370 Utt to 354 Utt, and 317 Utt to 314 Utt are predicted to be nuclides.
  • All are too far from the neutron dripline to form directly.
  • It is possible to simulate the formation of nuclides via decay chains using data from Ref.3 and assuming an initial distribution close to the neutron dripline.

Details of the model are provided in “Nuclear Decay Chains at High A” in this wiki. Per that model, 60 predicted isotopes; 443 Utt to 384 Utt; can form. Neutron capture may be able to produce nuclides up to A around 360 before fission attrition stops further growth.

  1. It is likely that neutron capture can form the lightest of those Utt isotopes which can form, but unlikely that it can form heavier isotopes.
  2. Fission infall may contribute small amounts of nuclides with A up to 406 (nominal).
  3. PERSISTENCE 401 Utt and heavier isotopes will vanish within 1000 sec after a neutron star merger which led to their formation, or lie at higher Z than beta-decay chains which end in nuclides which fission with a half-life not much greater than 1 sec.400 Utt to 364 Utt lie at higher Z than the terminations of beta-decay chains that would populate them.

In all cases, chains end in short-lived, fission-decaying nuclides.363 Utt to 353 Utt lie at higher Z than the terminations of beta-decay chains that would populate them. Beta-decay chains end in long-lived nuclides, which decay by either fission or alpha emission.

  1. If lighter isotopes of Utt can form, they are not expected to persist significantly.
  2. Calculations done under maximum half-life assumptions and with all nuclides initially populated still point to all isotopes of Utt vanishing within 10 5.5 (3.16E05) sec.
  3. N = 258 SHELL CLOSURE Some studies of the neutron dripline indicate a strong shell closure at N = 258, instead of the relatively weak one occurring in the predictive models, If so, and if peak half-lives in the region do approach 0.5 yr; it is possible that one or more Utt isotopes may persist for up to 60 yrs, probably as a daughter of a long-lived ancestor.

ATOMIC PROPERTIES Utt is expected to be an 8th period active metal (superactinide). Its consensus electron configuration has been predicted (6) to be 5g 8 6f 3 8s 2 8p 2 1/2, REFERENCES 1. for example, “Nuclear Energy Density Functionals: What Do We Really Know?”; Aurel Bulgac, Michael McNeil Forbes, and Shi Jin; Researchgate publication 279633220 or arXiv: 1506.09195v1 30 Jun 2015.2.

  1. For example “Fission Mechanism of Exotic Nuclei”; Research Group for Heavy Element Nuclear Science; http://asrc.jaea.go.jp/soshiki/gr/HENS-gr/np/research/pageFission_e.html,; 17 Sept 17.3.
  2. Decay Modes and a Limit of Existence of Nuclei”; H.
  3. Oura; 4th Int. Conf.
  4. On the Chemistry and Physics of Transactinide Elements; Sept.2011.4.

“Nuclear Properties for Astrophysical Applications”; P. Moller & J.R. Nix; Los Alamos National Laboratory website; search by “LANL, T2”, then “Nuclear Properties for Astrophysical Applications”.5. “Magic Numbers of Ultraheavy Nuclei”; Vitali Denisov; Physics of Atomic Nuclei; researchgate.net/publications/225734594; July 2005.6.

9-Period Periodic Table of Elements
1 1 H 2 He
2 3 Li 4 Be 5 B 6 C 7 N 8 O 9 F 10 Ne
3 11 Na 12 Mg 13 Al 14 Si 15 P 16 S 17 Cl 18 Ar
4 19 K 20 Ca 21 Sc 22 Ti 23 V 24 Cr 25 Mn 26 Fe 27 Co 28 Ni 29 Cu 30 Zn 31 Ga 32 Ge 33 As 34 Se 35 Br 36 Kr
5 37 Rb 38 Sr 39 Y 40 Zr 41 Nb 42 Mo 43 Tc 44 Ru 45 Rh 46 Pd 47 Ag 48 Cd 49 In 50 Sn 51 Sb 52 Te 53 I 54 Xe
6 55 Cs 56 Ba 57 La 58 Ce 59 Pr 60 Nd 61 Pm 62 Sm 63 Eu 64 Gd 65 Tb 66 Dy 67 Ho 68 Er 69 Tm 70 Yb 71 Lu 72 Hf 73 Ta 74 W 75 Re 76 Os 77 Ir 78 Pt 79 Au 80 Hg 81 Tl 82 Pb 83 Bi 84 Po 85 At 86 Rn
7 87 Fr 88 Ra 89 Ac 90 Th 91 Pa 92 U 93 Np 94 Pu 95 Am 96 Cm 97 Bk 98 Cf 99 Es 100 Fm 101 Md 102 No 103 Lr 104 Rf 105 Db 106 Sg 107 Bh 108 Hs 109 Mt 110 Ds 111 Rg 112 Cn 113 Nh 114 Fl 115 Mc 116 Lv 117 Ts 118 Og
8 119 Uue 120 Ubn 121 Ubu 122 Ubb 123 Ubt 124 Ubq 125 Ubp 126 Ubh 127 Ubs 128 Ubo 129 Ube 130 Utn 131 Utu 132 Utb 133 Utt 134 Utq 135 Utp 136 Uth 137 Uts 138 Uto 139 Ute 140 Uqn 141 Uqu 142 Uqb 143 Uqt 144 Uqq 145 Uqp 146 Uqh 147 Uqs 148 Uqo 149 Uqe 150 Upn 151 Upu 152 Upb 153 Upt 154 Upq 155 Upp 156 Uph 157 Ups 158 Upo 159 Upe 160 Uhn 161 Uhu 162 Uhb 163 Uht 164 Uhq 165 Uhp 166 Uhh 167 Uhs 168 Uho 169 Uhe 170 Usn 171 Usu 172 Usb
9 173 Ust 174 Usq
Alkali metal Alkaline earth metal Lanthanide Actinide Superactinide Transition metal Post-transition metal Metalloid Other nonmetal Halogen Noble gas
predicted predicted predicted predicted predicted predicted predicted predicted predicted

/td>

07-22-20)

Will element 119 be a metal?

Element 119 is expected to be a typical alkali metal with a +1 oxidation state.

Is element 118 real?

References –

  1. ^ Oganesson, The Periodic Table of Videos, University of Nottingham.15 December 2016.
  2. ^ Ritter, Malcolm (9 June 2016). “Periodic table elements named for Moscow, Japan, Tennessee”, Associated Press, Retrieved 19 December 2017,
  3. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k Nash, Clinton S. (2005). “Atomic and Molecular Properties of Elements 112, 114, and 118”. Journal of Physical Chemistry A,109 (15): 3493–3500. Bibcode : 2005JPCA.109.3493N, doi : 10.1021/jp050736o, PMID 16833687,
  4. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Hoffman, Darleane C.; Lee, Diana M.; Pershina, Valeria (2006). “Transactinides and the future elements”. In Morss; Edelstein, Norman M.; Fuger, Jean (eds.). The Chemistry of the Actinide and Transactinide Elements (3rd ed.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media, ISBN 978-1-4020-3555-5,
  5. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i Smits, Odile; Mewes, Jan-Michael; Jerabek, Paul; Schwerdtfeger, Peter (2020). “Oganesson: A Noble Gas Element That Is Neither Noble Nor a Gas”, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed,59 (52): 23636–23640. doi : 10.1002/anie.202011976, PMC 7814676, PMID 32959952,
  6. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e Han, Young-Kyu; Bae, Cheolbeom; Son, Sang-Kil; Lee, Yoon Sup (2000). “Spin–orbit effects on the transactinide p-block element monohydrides MH (M=element 113–118)”. Journal of Chemical Physics,112 (6): 2684. Bibcode : 2000JChPh.112.2684H, doi : 10.1063/1.480842,
  7. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e Kaldor, Uzi; Wilson, Stephen (2003). Theoretical Chemistry and Physics of Heavy and Superheavy Elements, Springer.p.105. ISBN 978-1402013713, Retrieved 18 January 2008,
  8. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Guo, Yangyang; Pašteka, Lukáš F.; Eliav, Ephraim; Borschevsky, Anastasia (2021). “Chapter 5: Ionization potentials and electron affinity of oganesson with relativistic coupled cluster method”. In Musiał, Monika; Hoggan, Philip E. (eds.). Advances in Quantum Chemistry, Vol.83. pp.107–123. ISBN 978-0-12-823546-1,
  9. ^ Oganesson, American Elements
  10. ^ Oganesson – Element information, properties and uses, Royal Chemical Society
  11. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Grosse, A.V. (1965). “Some physical and chemical properties of element 118 (Eka-Em) and element 86 (Em)”. Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry, Elsevier Science Ltd.27 (3): 509–19. doi : 10.1016/0022-1902(65)80255-X,
  12. ^ Kondev, F.G.; Wang, M.; Huang, W.J.; Naimi, S.; Audi, G. (2021). “The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear properties” (PDF), Chinese Physics C,45 (3): 030001. doi : 10.1088/1674-1137/abddae,
  13. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g Oganessian, Yu. Ts.; Utyonkov, V.K.; Lobanov, Yu.V.; Abdullin, F. Sh.; Polyakov, A.N.; Sagaidak, R.N.; Shirokovsky, I.V.; Tsyganov, Yu.S.; et al. (9 October 2006). “Synthesis of the isotopes of elements 118 and 116 in the 249 Cf and 245 Cm+ 48 Ca fusion reactions”, Physical Review C,74 (4): 044602. Bibcode : 2006PhRvC.74d4602O, doi : 10.1103/PhysRevC.74.044602, Retrieved 18 January 2008,
  14. ^ Oganessian, Yuri Ts.; Rykaczewski, Krzysztof P. (August 2015). “A beachhead on the island of stability”. Physics Today,68 (8): 32–38. Bibcode : 2015PhT.68h.32O, doi : 10.1063/PT.3.2880, OSTI 1337838,
  15. ^ “IUPAC Announces the Names of the Elements 113, 115, 117, and 118”, IUPAC,30 November 2016. Archived from the original on 30 November 2016, Retrieved 1 December 2015,
  16. ^ St. Fleur, Nicholas (1 December 2016). “Four New Names Officially Added to the Periodic Table of Elements”, The New York Times, Retrieved 1 December 2016,
  17. ^ Jump up to: a b c “IUPAC Is Naming The Four New Elements Nihonium, Moscovium, Tennessine, And Oganesson”, IUPAC,8 June 2016. Archived from the original on 8 June 2016.
  18. ^ Hoffman, Ghiorso & Seaborg 2000, pp.187–189.
  19. ^ “The Top 6 Physics Stories of 2006”, Discover Magazine.7 January 2007. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007, Retrieved 18 January 2008,
  20. ^ Wakhle, A.; Simenel, C.; Hinde, D.J.; et al. (2015). Simenel, C.; Gomes, P.R.S.; Hinde, D.J.; et al. (eds.). “Comparing Experimental and Theoretical Quasifission Mass Angle Distributions”, European Physical Journal Web of Conferences,86 : 00061. Bibcode : 2015EPJWC.8600061W, doi : 10.1051/epjconf/20158600061, ISSN 2100-014X,
  21. ^ Krämer, K. (2016). “Explainer: superheavy elements”, Chemistry World, Retrieved 15 March 2020,
  22. ^ “Discovery of Elements 113 and 115”, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Archived from the original on 11 September 2015, Retrieved 15 March 2020,
  23. ^ Eliav, E.; Kaldor, U.; Borschevsky, A. (2018). “Electronic Structure of the Transactinide Atoms”. In Scott, R.A. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Inorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, pp.1–16. doi : 10.1002/9781119951438.eibc2632, ISBN 978-1-119-95143-8, S2CID 127060181,
  24. ^ Oganessian, Yu. Ts. ; Dmitriev, S.N.; Yeremin, A.V.; et al. (2009). “Attempt to produce the isotopes of element 108 in the fusion reaction 136 Xe + 136 Xe”. Physical Review C,79 (2): 024608. doi : 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.024608, ISSN 0556-2813,
  25. ^ Münzenberg, G. ; Armbruster, P. ; Folger, H.; et al. (1984). “The identification of element 108” (PDF), Zeitschrift für Physik A,317 (2): 235–236. Bibcode : 1984ZPhyA.317.235M, doi : 10.1007/BF01421260, S2CID 123288075, Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 June 2015, Retrieved 20 October 2012,
  26. ^ Jump up to: a b Subramanian, S. (2019). “Making New Elements Doesn’t Pay. Just Ask This Berkeley Scientist”, Bloomberg Businessweek, Archived from the original on 14 November 2020, Retrieved 18 January 2020,
  27. ^ Jump up to: a b Ivanov, D. (2019). ” “, N+1 (in Russian), Retrieved 2 February 2020,
  28. ^ Hinde, D. (2014). “Something new and superheavy at the periodic table”, The Conversation, Retrieved 30 January 2020,
  29. ^ Jump up to: a b Krása, A. (2010). “Neutron Sources for ADS” (PDF), Czech Technical University in Prague, pp.4–8. S2CID 28796927, Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 March 2019, Retrieved 20 October 2019,
  30. ^ Wapstra, A.H. (1991). “Criteria that must be satisfied for the discovery of a new chemical element to be recognized” (PDF), Pure and Applied Chemistry,63 (6): 883. doi : 10.1351/pac199163060879, ISSN 1365-3075, S2CID 95737691, Retrieved 28 August 2020,
  31. ^ Jump up to: a b Hyde, E.K.; Hoffman, D.C. ; Keller, O.L. (1987). “A History and Analysis of the Discovery of Elements 104 and 105”, Radiochimica Acta,42 (2): 67–68. doi : 10.1524/ract.1987.42.2.57, ISSN 2193-3405, S2CID 99193729,
  32. ^ Jump up to: a b c Chemistry World (2016). “How to Make Superheavy Elements and Finish the Periodic Table “, Scientific American, Retrieved 27 January 2020,
  33. ^ Hoffman, Ghiorso & Seaborg 2000, p.334.
  34. ^ Hoffman, Ghiorso & Seaborg 2000, p.335.
  35. ^ Zagrebaev, Karpov & Greiner 2013, p.3.
  36. ^ Beiser 2003, p.432.
  37. ^ Staszczak, A.; Baran, A.; Nazarewicz, W. (2013). “Spontaneous fission modes and lifetimes of superheavy elements in the nuclear density functional theory”. Physical Review C,87 (2): 024320–1. arXiv : 1208.1215, Bibcode : 2013PhRvC.87b4320S, doi : 10.1103/physrevc.87.024320, ISSN 0556-2813, S2CID 118134429,
  38. ^ Audi, G.; Kondev, F.G.; Wang, M.; et al. (2017). “The NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear properties”. Chinese Physics C,41 (3): 030001-128–030001-138. Bibcode : 2017ChPhC.41c0001A, doi : 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030001,
  39. ^ Beiser 2003, p.439.
  40. ^ Oganessian, Yu. Ts.; Rykaczewski, K.P. (2015). “A beachhead on the island of stability”, Physics Today,68 (8): 32–38. Bibcode : 2015PhT.68h.32O, doi : 10.1063/PT.3.2880, ISSN 0031-9228, OSTI 1337838, S2CID 119531411,
  41. ^ Grant, A. (2018). “Weighing the heaviest elements”. Physics Today, doi : 10.1063/PT.6.1.20181113a, S2CID 239775403,
  42. ^ Howes, L. (2019). “Exploring the superheavy elements at the end of the periodic table”, Chemical & Engineering News, Retrieved 27 January 2020,
  43. ^ Jump up to: a b Robinson, A.E. (2019). “The Transfermium Wars: Scientific Brawling and Name-Calling during the Cold War”, Distillations, Retrieved 22 February 2020,
  44. ^ “, ()”, n-t.ru (in Russian), Retrieved 7 January 2020, Reprinted from “”,, — (in Russian). Nauka,1977.
  45. ^ “Nobelium – Element information, properties and uses | Periodic Table”, Royal Society of Chemistry, Retrieved 1 March 2020,
  46. ^ Jump up to: a b Kragh 2018, pp.38–39.
  47. ^ Kragh 2018, p.40.
  48. ^ Ghiorso, A.; Seaborg, G.T. ; Oganessian, Yu. Ts.; et al. (1993). “Responses on the report ‘Discovery of the Transfermium elements’ followed by reply to the responses by Transfermium Working Group” (PDF), Pure and Applied Chemistry,65 (8): 1815–1824. doi : 10.1351/pac199365081815, S2CID 95069384, Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 November 2013, Retrieved 7 September 2016,
  49. ^ Commission on Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry (1997). “Names and symbols of transfermium elements (IUPAC Recommendations 1997)” (PDF), Pure and Applied Chemistry,69 (12): 2471–2474. doi : 10.1351/pac199769122471,
  50. ^ Kragh 2018, p.6.
  51. ^ Leach, Mark R. “The INTERNET Database of Periodic Tables”, Retrieved 8 July 2016,
  52. ^ Jump up to: a b c Fricke, Burkhard (1975). “Superheavy elements: a prediction of their chemical and physical properties”, Recent Impact of Physics on Inorganic Chemistry, Structure and Bonding.21 : 89–144. doi : 10.1007/BFb0116498, ISBN 978-3-540-07109-9, Retrieved 4 October 2013,
  53. ^ Pitzer, Kenneth (1975). “Are elements 112, 114, and 118 relatively inert gases?”, The Journal of Chemical Physics,2 (63): 1032–1033. doi : 10.1063/1.431398,
  54. ^ Jump up to: a b Smolanczuk, R. (1999). “Production mechanism of superheavy nuclei in cold fusion reactions”. Physical Review C,59 (5): 2634–2639. Bibcode : 1999PhRvC.59.2634S, doi : 10.1103/PhysRevC.59.2634,
  55. ^ Ninov, Viktor (1999). “Observation of Superheavy Nuclei Produced in the Reaction of 86 Kr with 208 Pb”, Physical Review Letters,83 (6): 1104–1107. Bibcode : 1999PhRvL.83.1104N, doi : 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1104, (Retracted, see doi : 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.039901 )
  56. ^ Service, R.F. (1999). “Berkeley Crew Bags Element 118”. Science,284 (5421): 1751. doi : 10.1126/science.284.5421.1751, S2CID 220094113,
  57. ^ “Results of element 118 experiment retracted”, Authored by Public Affairs Department. Berkeley Lab.21 July 2001. Archived from the original on 29 January 2008, Retrieved 18 January 2008, } : CS1 maint: others ( link )
  58. ^ Dalton, R. (2002). “Misconduct: The stars who fell to Earth”. Nature,420 (6917): 728–729. Bibcode : 2002Natur.420.728D, doi : 10.1038/420728a, PMID 12490902, S2CID 4398009,
  59. ^ “Element 118 disappears two years after it was discovered”, Physics World,2 August 2001, Retrieved 2 April 2012,
  60. ^ Zagrebaev, Karpov & Greiner 2013,
  61. ^ Oganessian, Yu.T.; et al. (2002). “Results from the first 249 Cf + 48 Ca experiment” (PDF), JINR Communication, Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 December 2004, Retrieved 13 June 2009,
  62. ^ Jump up to: a b Moody, Ken (30 November 2013). “Synthesis of Superheavy Elements”. In Schädel, Matthias; Shaughnessy, Dawn (eds.). The Chemistry of Superheavy Elements (2nd ed.). Springer Science & Business Media. pp.24–8. ISBN 9783642374661,
  63. ^ Oganessian, Yu.T.; et al. (2002). “Element 118: results from the first 249 Cf + 48 Ca experiment”, Communication of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research. Archived from the original on 22 July 2011.
  64. ^ “Livermore scientists team with Russia to discover element 118”, Livermore press release.3 December 2006. Archived from the original on 17 October 2011, Retrieved 18 January 2008,
  65. ^ Oganessian, Yu.T. (2006). “Synthesis and decay properties of superheavy elements”, Pure Appl. Chem,78 (5): 889–904. doi : 10.1351/pac200678050889, S2CID 55782333,
  66. ^ Sanderson, K. (2006). “Heaviest element made – again”. Nature News, doi : 10.1038/news061016-4, S2CID 121148847,
  67. ^ Schewe, P. & Stein, B. (17 October 2006). “Elements 116 and 118 Are Discovered”, Physics News Update, American Institute of Physics, Archived from the original on 1 January 2012, Retrieved 18 January 2008,
  68. ^ Weiss, R. (17 October 2006). “Scientists Announce Creation of Atomic Element, the Heaviest Yet”, The Washington Post, Retrieved 18 January 2008,
  69. ^ Barber, Robert C.; Karol, Paul J.; Nakahara, Hiromichi; Vardaci, Emanuele; Vogt, Erich W. (2011). “Discovery of the elements with atomic numbers greater than or equal to 113 (IUPAC Technical Report)”, Pure and Applied Chemistry,83 (7): 1. doi : 10.1351/PAC-REP-10-05-01,
  70. ^ “Oganesson”, WebElements Periodic Table, Retrieved 19 August 2019,
  71. ^ Jacoby, Mitch (17 October 2006). “Element 118 Detected, With Confidence”, Chemical & Engineering News,84 (43): 11. doi : 10.1021/cen-v084n043.p011, Retrieved 18 January 2008, I would say we’re very confident.
  72. ^ Discovery and Assignment of Elements with Atomic Numbers 113, 115, 117 and 118, IUPAC (30 December 2015)
  73. ^ Karol, Paul J.; Barber, Robert C.; Sherrill, Bradley M.; Vardaci, Emanuele; Yamazaki, Toshimitsu (29 December 2015). “Discovery of the element with atomic number Z = 118 completing the 7th row of the periodic table (IUPAC Technical Report)”, Pure Appl. Chem,88 (1–2): 155–160. doi : 10.1515/pac-2015-0501, S2CID 102228960,
  74. ^ Jump up to: a b Voinov, A.A.; Oganessian, Yu. Ts; Abdullin, F. Sh.; Brewer, N.T.; Dmitriev, S.N.; Grzywacz, R.K.; Hamilton, J.H.; Itkis, M.G.; Miernik, K.; Polyakov, A.N.; Roberto, J.B.; Rykaczewski, K.P.; Sabelnikov, A.V.; Sagaidak, R.N.; Shriokovsky, I.V.; Shumeiko, M.V.; Stoyer, M.A.; Subbotin, V.G.; Sukhov, A.M.; Tsyganov, Yu.S.; Utyonkov, V.K.; Vostokin, G.K. (2016). “Results from the Recent Study of the 249–251 Cf + 48 Ca Reactions”. In Peninozhkevich, Yu.E.; Sobolev, Yu.G. (eds.). Exotic Nuclei: EXON-2016 Proceedings of the International Symposium on Exotic Nuclei, Exotic Nuclei. pp.219–223. ISBN 9789813226555,
  75. ^ Sychev, Vladimir (8 February 2017). ” :, “, RIA Novosti (in Russian), Retrieved 31 March 2017,
  76. ^ Roberto, J.B. (31 March 2015). “Actinide Targets for Super-Heavy Element Research” (PDF), cyclotron.tamu.edu, Texas A & M University, Retrieved 28 April 2017,
  77. ^ Hauschild, K. (26 June 2019). Superheavy nuclei at RIKEN, Dubna, and JYFL (PDF), Conseil Scientifique de l’IN2P3, Retrieved 31 July 2019,
  78. ^ Hauschild, K. (2019). Heavy nuclei at RIKEN, Dubna, and JYFL (PDF), Conseil Scientifique de l’IN2P3, Retrieved 1 August 2019,
  79. ^ Chatt, J. (1979). “Recommendations for the Naming of Elements of Atomic Numbers Greater than 100”, Pure Appl. Chem,51 (2): 381–384. doi : 10.1351/pac197951020381,
  80. ^ Wieser, M.E. (2006). “Atomic weights of the elements 2005 (IUPAC Technical Report)”, Pure Appl. Chem,78 (11): 2051–2066. doi : 10.1351/pac200678112051, S2CID 94552853,
  81. ^ “Discovery of New Elements Makes Front Page News”, Berkeley Lab Research Review Summer 1999.1999, Retrieved 18 January 2008,
  82. ^ Koppenol, W.H. (2002). “Naming of new elements (IUPAC Recommendations 2002)” (PDF), Pure and Applied Chemistry,74 (5): 787. doi : 10.1351/pac200274050787, S2CID 95859397,
  83. ^ “New chemical elements discovered in Russia’s Science City”,12 February 2007, Retrieved 9 February 2008,
  84. ^ Yemel’yanova, Asya (17 December 2006). “118- – (118th element will be named in Russian)” (in Russian). vesti.ru. Archived from the original on 25 December 2008, Retrieved 18 January 2008,
  85. ^ ” 116 (Russian Physicians Will Suggest to Name Element 116 Moscovium)” (in Russian). rian.ru.2011, Retrieved 8 May 2011,
  86. ^ “News: Start of the Name Approval Process for the Elements of Atomic Number 114 and 116”, International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Archived from the original on 23 August 2014, Retrieved 2 December 2011,
  87. ^ Koppenol, W.H. (2002). “Naming of new elements (IUPAC Recommendations 2002)” (PDF), Pure and Applied Chemistry,74 (5): 787–791. doi : 10.1351/pac200274050787, S2CID 95859397,
  88. ^ Koppenol, Willem H.; Corish, John; García-Martínez, Javier; Meija, Juris; Reedijk, Jan (2016). “How to name new chemical elements (IUPAC Recommendations 2016)” (PDF), Pure and Applied Chemistry,88 (4): 401–405. doi : 10.1515/pac-2015-0802, hdl : 10045/55935, S2CID 102245448,
  89. ^ “What it takes to make a new element”, Chemistry World, Retrieved 3 December 2016,
  90. ^ Jump up to: a b Tarasevich, Grigoriy; Lapenko, Igor (2019). “, “, Kot Shryodingyera (in Russian). No. Special. Direktsiya Festivalya Nauki.p.22.
  91. ^ Jump up to: a b Gray, Richard (11 April 2017). “Mr Element 118: The only living person on the periodic table”, New Scientist, Retrieved 26 April 2017,
  92. ^ Fedorova, Vera (3 March 2017). “At the inauguration ceremony of the new elements of the Periodic table of D.I. Mendeleev”, jinr.ru, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Retrieved 4 February 2018,
  93. ^ de Marcillac, P.; Coron, N.; Dambier, G.; et al. (2003). “Experimental detection of α-particles from the radioactive decay of natural bismuth”. Nature,422 (6934): 876–878. Bibcode : 2003Natur.422.876D, doi : 10.1038/nature01541, PMID 12712201, S2CID 4415582,
  94. ^ Möller, P. (2016). “The limits of the nuclear chart set by fission and alpha decay” (PDF), EPJ Web of Conferences,131 : 03002:1–8. Bibcode : 2016EPJWC.13103002M, doi : 10.1051/epjconf/201613103002,
  95. ^ Considine, G.D.; Kulik, Peter H. (2002). Van Nostrand’s scientific encyclopedia (9th ed.). Wiley-Interscience. ISBN 978-0-471-33230-5, OCLC 223349096,
  96. ^ Oganessian, Yu. Ts.; Sobiczewski, A.; Ter-Akopian, G.M. (9 January 2017). “Superheavy nuclei: from predictions to discovery”. Physica Scripta,92 (2): 023003–1–21. Bibcode : 2017PhyS.92b3003O, doi : 10.1088/1402-4896/aa53c1, S2CID 125713877,
  97. ^ “Oganesson – Element information, properties and uses | Periodic Table”, www.rsc.org, Retrieved 25 January 2023,
  98. ^ “Oganesson – Protons – Neutrons – Electrons – Electron Configuration”, Material Properties,8 December 2020, Retrieved 25 January 2023,
  99. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Chowdhury, Roy P.; Samanta, C.; Basu, D.N. (2006). “α decay half-lives of new superheavy elements”. Phys. Rev.C,73 (1): 014612. arXiv : nucl-th/0507054, Bibcode : 2006PhRvC.73a4612C, doi : 10.1103/PhysRevC.73.014612, S2CID 118739116,
  100. ^ Oganessian, Yu.T. (2007). “Heaviest nuclei from 48 Ca-induced reactions”. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics,34 (4): R165–R242. Bibcode : 2007JPhG.34R.165O, doi : 10.1088/0954-3899/34/4/R01,
  101. ^ Chowdhury, Roy P.; Samanta, C.; Basu, D.N. (2008). “Search for long lived heaviest nuclei beyond the valley of stability”. Physical Review C,77 (4): 044603. arXiv : 0802.3837, Bibcode : 2008PhRvC.77d4603C, doi : 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.044603, S2CID 119207807,
  102. ^ Chowdhury, R.P.; Samanta, C.; Basu, D.N. (2008). “Nuclear half-lives for α -radioactivity of elements with 100 ≤ Z ≤ 130”. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables,94 (6): 781–806. arXiv : 0802.4161, Bibcode : 2008ADNDT.94.781C, doi : 10.1016/j.adt.2008.01.003, S2CID 96718440,
  103. ^ Jump up to: a b Royer, G.; Zbiri, K.; Bonilla, C. (2004). “Entrance channels and alpha decay half-lives of the heaviest elements”. Nuclear Physics A,730 (3–4): 355–376. arXiv : nucl-th/0410048, Bibcode : 2004NuPhA.730.355R, doi : 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.010,
  104. ^ Duarte, S.B.; Tavares, O.A.P.; Gonçalves, M.; Rodríguez, O.; Guzmán, F.; Barbosa, T.N.; García, F.; Dimarco, A. (2004). “Half-life predictions for decay modes of superheavy nuclei” (PDF), Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics,30 (10): 1487–1494. Bibcode : 2004JPhG.30.1487D, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.692.3012, doi : 10.1088/0954-3899/30/10/014,
  105. ^ Oganessian, Yu. Ts.; Utyonkov, V.; Lobanov, Yu.; Abdullin, F.; Polyakov, A.; Shirokovsky, I.; Tsyganov, Yu.; Gulbekian, G.; Bogomolov, S.; Gikal, B.N.; et al. (2004). “Measurements of cross sections and decay properties of the isotopes of elements 112, 114, and 116 produced in the fusion reactions 233,238 U, 242 Pu, and 248 Cm+ 48 Ca” (PDF), Physical Review C,70 (6): 064609. Bibcode : 2004PhRvC.70f4609O, doi : 10.1103/PhysRevC.70.064609,
  106. ^ Samanta, C.; Chowdhury, R.P.; Basu, D.N. (2007). “Predictions of alpha decay half-lives of heavy and superheavy elements”. Nucl. Phys.A,789 (1–4): 142–154. arXiv : nucl-th/0703086, Bibcode : 2007NuPhA.789.142S, doi : 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.04.001, S2CID 7496348,
  107. ^ Bader, Richard F.W. “An Introduction to the Electronic Structure of Atoms and Molecules”, McMaster University, Retrieved 18 January 2008,
  108. ^ “Ununoctium (Uuo) – Chemical properties, Health and Environmental effects”, Lenntech. Archived from the original on 16 January 2008, Retrieved 18 January 2008,
  109. ^ Jump up to: a b Goidenko, Igor; Labzowsky, Leonti; Eliav, Ephraim; Kaldor, Uzi; Pyykkö, Pekka (2003). “QED corrections to the binding energy of the eka-radon (Z=118) negative ion”. Physical Review A,67 (2): 020102(R). Bibcode : 2003PhRvA.67b0102G, doi : 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.020102,
  110. ^ Eliav, Ephraim; Kaldor, Uzi; Ishikawa, Y.; Pyykkö, P. (1996). “Element 118: The First Rare Gas with an Electron Affinity”. Physical Review Letters,77 (27): 5350–5352. Bibcode : 1996PhRvL.77.5350E, doi : 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.5350, PMID 10062781,
  111. ^ Landau, Arie; Eliav, Ephraim; Ishikawa, Yasuyuki; Kador, Uzi (25 May 2001). “Benchmark calculations of electron affinities of the alkali atoms sodium to eka-francium (element 119)”, Journal of Chemical Physics,115 (6): 2389–92. Bibcode : 2001JChPh.115.2389L, doi : 10.1063/1.1386413, Retrieved 15 September 2015,
  112. ^ Borschevsky, Anastasia; Pershina, Valeria; Kaldor, Uzi; Eliav, Ephraim. “Fully relativistic ab initio studies of superheavy elements” (PDF), www.kernchemie.uni-mainz.de, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 January 2018, Retrieved 15 January 2018,
  113. ^ Borschevsky, Anastasia; Pershina, Valeria; Eliav, Ephraim; Kaldor, Uzi (27 August 2009). “Electron affinity of element 114, with comparison to Sn and Pb”. Chemical Physics Letters,480 (1): 49–51. Bibcode : 2009CPL.480.49B, doi : 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.08.059,
  114. ^ Nash, Clinton S.; Bursten, Bruce E. (1999). “Spin-Orbit Effects, VSEPR Theory, and the Electronic Structures of Heavy and Superheavy Group IVA Hydrides and Group VIIIA Tetrafluorides. A Partial Role Reversal for Elements 114 and 118”. Journal of Physical Chemistry A,1999 (3): 402–410. Bibcode : 1999JPCA.103.402N, doi : 10.1021/jp982735k, PMID 27676357,
  115. ^ Jump up to: a b Jerabek, Paul; Schuetrumpf, Bastian; Schwerdtfeger, Peter; Nazarewicz, Witold (2018). “Electron and Nucleon Localization Functions of Oganesson: Approaching the Thomas-Fermi Limit”. Phys. Rev. Lett,120 (5): 053001. arXiv : 1707.08710, Bibcode : 2018PhRvL.120e3001J, doi : 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.053001, PMID 29481184, S2CID 3575243,
  116. ^ Schuetrumpf, B.; Nazarewicz, W.; Reinhard, P.-G. (11 August 2017). “Central depression in nucleonic densities: Trend analysis in the nuclear density functional theory approach”, Physical Review C,96 (2): 024306. arXiv : 1706.05759, Bibcode : 2017PhRvC.96b4306S, doi : 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.024306, S2CID 119510865,
  117. ^ Garisto, Dan (12 February 2018). “5 ways the heaviest element on the periodic table is really bizarre”, ScienceNews, Retrieved 12 February 2023,
  118. ^ Mewes, Jan-Michael; Smits, Odile Rosette; Jerabek, Paul; Schwerdtfeger, Peter (25 July 2019). “Oganesson is a Semiconductor: On the Relativistic Band‐Gap Narrowing in the Heaviest Noble‐Gas Solids”, Angewandte Chemie,58 (40): 14260–14264. doi : 10.1002/anie.201908327, PMC 6790653, PMID 31343819,
  119. ^ “Oganesson: Compounds Information”, WebElements Periodic Table, Retrieved 19 August 2019,
  120. ^ Jump up to: a b Han, Young-Kyu; Lee, Yoon Sup (1999). “Structures of RgFn (Rg = Xe, Rn, and Element 118. n = 2, 4.) Calculated by Two-component Spin-Orbit Methods. A Spin-Orbit Induced Isomer of (118)F 4 “. Journal of Physical Chemistry A,103 (8): 1104–1108. Bibcode : 1999JPCA.103.1104H, doi : 10.1021/jp983665k,
  121. ^ Liebman, Joel F. (1975). “Conceptual Problems in Noble Gas and Fluorine Chemistry, II: The Nonexistence of Radon Tetrafluoride”. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett,11 (10): 683–685. doi : 10.1016/0020-1650(75)80185-1,
  122. ^ Seppelt, Konrad (2015). “Molecular Hexafluorides”. Chemical Reviews,115 (2): 1296–1306. doi : 10.1021/cr5001783, PMID 25418862,
  123. ^ Pitzer, Kenneth S. (1975). “Fluorides of radon and element 118” (PDF), Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications (18): 760–761. doi : 10.1039/C3975000760b,
  124. ^ Jump up to: a b Seaborg, Glenn Theodore (c.2006). “transuranium element (chemical element)”, Britannica Online, Retrieved 16 March 2010,
  125. ^ Loveland, Walter (1 June 2021). “Relativistic effects for the superheavy reaction Og + 2Ts2 → OgTs4 (Td or D4h): dramatic relativistic effects for atomization energy of superheavy Oganesson tetratennesside OgTs4 and prediction of the existence of tetrahedral OgTs4”, Theoretical Chemistry Accounts,140 (75). doi : 10.1007/s00214-021-02777-2, S2CID 235259897, Retrieved 30 June 2021,

Has element 114 been created?

Chemistry in its element: flerovium – Since this podcast was first published, the name of this element has been ratified as flerovium (symbol Fl) by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (Iupac). The name recognises Russian physicist Georgiy Flerov, who discovered the spontaneous fission of uranium.

Flerov also gives his name to the laboratory at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia, where the element was first made. (Promo) You’re listening to Chemistry in its element brought to you by Chemistry World, the magazine of the Royal Society of Chemistry. (End promo) Meera Senthilingam This week we are element spotting with Brian Clegg.

Brian Clegg It’s easy to accuse the scientists who produce new, very heavy elements of being chemistry’s train spotters. Just as train spotters spend hours watching for a particular locomotive so they can underline it in their book, it may seem that these chemists laboriously produce an atom or two of a superheavy element as an exercise in ticking the box.

But element 114 has provided more than one surprise, showing why such elements are well worth investigating. This is one of the elements that is still waiting to have a proper name assigned to it, so it remains for the moment ununquadium (just one-one-four-ium in truncated Latin), with the symbol Uuq, until it receives a more aesthetically pleasing label.

Element 114 sits in an island of stability, a position in the periodic table where a spherical nuclear configuration suggests that half lives should be relatively long. That word ‘relatively’ is important. Where, for instance, darmstadtium, which precedes the island of stability, has a typical half life measured in microseconds, element 114’s isotope with atomic mass 289 stays around for seconds at a time.

In principle, there is an isotope of element 114 that should do even better. The expectation, long before 114 was even produced, was that ununquadium 298 should be particularly stable. The nucleus of this isotope would have 114 protons and 184 neutrons, which should provide complete energy levels in the nucleus and hence unusual stability.

Ununquadium 298 has a predicted half life that could reach into thousands of years – remarkable for the transfermium elements, which are generally the mayflies of the periodic table. To date we haven’t been able to test this thesis, because no isotope 298 has been produced.

  1. The first sighting of element 114 was in 1998 at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research at Dubna in Russia.
  2. This doesn’t mean that we can look forward to dubnium as a name for the element, this is already assigned to element 105.
  3. Using a plutonium 244 target, produced by Kenton Moody at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, the team lead by Yuri Oganessian and Vladimir Utyonkov in Dubna took aim with a stream of high energy calcium 48 ions.

This rare, but naturally occurring isotope of calcium was blasted into the plutonium for 40 days, during which 5 million trillion ions were shot down the accelerator. Just one, single atom of the isotope 289 of element 114 was discovered, which took 30.4 seconds to decay.

  • The team at Dubna have since produced tiny quantities of isotopes 286, 287 and 288.
  • Interestingly the half life of 30 seconds for that first atom has never been reproduced – all subsequent ununquadium 289 has had a half life of around 2.6 seconds, leading to speculation that the first experiment produced a special excited state of the nucleus called a nuclear isomer, a state which typical has an extra-long half life.

Unlike many transfermium elements, element 114 was predicted to fit well into its group in the periodic table. It is positioned in group 14, underneath lead. The first great success of the periodic table was Mendeleev’s prediction of the existence of elements that had yet to be discovered.

  1. There were gaps in his table where he placed elements that he named after the element immediately above.
  2. He constructed the names by adding the prefix eka, which is Sanskrit for the number ‘one’.
  3. So, Mendeleev said, we should have eka-boron, eka-aluminium, eka-manganese and eka-silicon.
  4. Eka-silicon, for instance, is now called germanium and measured up well to Mendeleev’s predictions.

Similarly, for a long time it was assumed that element 114 would be eka-lead, with properties like that metal. Remarkably, however, although atoms have only been produced in ones and twos, there is some evidence that ununquadium behaves more like a noble gas than a metal.

  1. This concept, still to be fully explored, is based on experiments where the element 114 atoms are passed down a tube with an inner coating of gold.
  2. Along the length of the tube, the temperature gradually decreases, dropping from 15 degrees Celsius to a chilly minus 185 degrees, gradually reducing the energy of the atoms passing along, making them easier to capture.

The prediction is that a metal with lead-like properties should bind onto the gold easily, so will not get far down the tube. But a noble gas would have to be significantly chilled to undergo adsorption from the weak van der Waals force. Rather than behaving like lead, element 114 seems to make it to the cold end of the tube before being captured, its position detected when it decays after a second or two.

  1. This experiment, conducted by Heinz Gäggeler of the Paul Scherrer Institute in Villigen, Switzerland, but working at Dubna is still only provisional, but the noble gas behaviour may be a result of relativistic effects.
  2. Einstein’s special relativity predicts that particles will get heavier and heavier as their velocity gets closer to the speed of light.

A particle accelerated to around 42 per cent of the speed of light, for instance, will have a 10 per cent increase in mass. The expectation is that with an unusually high number of protons in the nucleus, the electrons will be moving fast enough to have relativistic effects that change the profile of their orbit, and hence the element’s chemical properties.

  • With such few atoms to experiment with, the result is not yet certain.
  • But something we do know for sure is that ununquadium is not just of interest to chemical train spotters.
  • Meera Senthilingam That was science writer and chemical spotter Brian Clegg with the chemistry of element 114.
  • Now next week, a dangerous yet useful element.

Andrea Sella Because it’s so volatile, you need to be really careful when you handle it since if you inhale it, it will decompose releasing poisonous carbon monoxide and dumping metallic nickel into your lungs. So it’s very dangerous indeed. But in a way, that’s the beauty of it: nickel carbonyl is incredibly fragile.

If you heat it up it shakes itself to pieces, and you get both the nickel and the carbon monoxide back. So what Mond had was a deliciously simple way to separate and purify nickel from any other metal. And what is more, he could recycle the carbon monoxide. Meera Senthilingam And to find out the uses and chemistry of the pure form of nickel, as well as its compounds, join UCL’s Andrea Sella in next week’s Chemistry in its element.

Until then I’m Meera Senthilingam and thank you for listening. (Promo) Chemistry in its element is brought to you by the Royal Society of Chemistry and produced by thenakedscientists.com, There’s more information and other episodes of Chemistry in its element on our website at chemistryworld.org/elements,

Has element 118 been found?

oganesson (Og), a transuranium element that occupies position 118 in the periodic table and is one of the noble gases, Oganesson is a synthetic element, and in 1999 scientists at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, California, announced the production of atoms of oganesson as a result of the bombardment of lead -208 with atoms of krypton -86.

  1. However, in 2002 this result was retracted after it was discovered that some of the data had been falsified.
  2. In 2006 scientists at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research at Dubna, Russia, announced that oganesson had been made in 2002 and 2005 in a cyclotron by the nuclear reaction of calcium -48 at an energy of 245 million electron volts (MeV) with a californium -249 target, with three neutrons and one atom of oganesson as the reaction products.

Nearly a millisecond after creation, the oganesson nucleus decays into another transuranium element, livermorium, by emitting an alpha particle ( helium nucleus). No physical or chemical properties of oganesson can be directly determined, since only a few atoms of oganesson have been produced, but it is likely that oganesson is a gas at room temperature.

The chemistry of oganesson, like radon, is expected to reflect its anticipated metalloid properties. In January 2016 the discovery of element 118 was recognized by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) and the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP). The discoverers named it oganesson after Russian physicist Yuri Oganessian, who led the group at Dubna that discovered it and several other of the heaviest transuranium elements.

The name oganesson was approved by IUPAC in November 2016.

Element Properties

atomic number 118
atomic weight 294
electron configuration (Rn)5 f 14 6 d 10 7 s 2 7 p 6

This article was most recently revised and updated by Erik Gregersen,